<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Support the &#8220;Green Infrastructure for Clean Water Act&#8221;!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cnt.org/news/2009/02/27/support-the-green-infrastructure-for-clean-water-act/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cnt.org/news/2009/02/27/support-the-green-infrastructure-for-clean-water-act/</link>
	<description>Sustainable Communities. Attainable Results.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 13:33:13 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Illinois Moves Toward More Sustainable Stormwater Management : Center for Neighborhood Technology</title>
		<link>http://www.cnt.org/news/2009/02/27/support-the-green-infrastructure-for-clean-water-act/comment-page-1/#comment-36139</link>
		<dc:creator>Illinois Moves Toward More Sustainable Stormwater Management : Center for Neighborhood Technology</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 19:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cnt.org/news/?p=886#comment-36139</guid>
		<description>[...] Legislature took a significant step toward statewide sustainable water policy by passing the Green Infrastructure for Clean Water Act, SB 1489. The bill sets the state on a path toward more effective and sustainable urban stormwater [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Legislature took a significant step toward statewide sustainable water policy by passing the Green Infrastructure for Clean Water Act, SB 1489. The bill sets the state on a path toward more effective and sustainable urban stormwater [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: April Bringing Cleaner Water to Illinois? : Center for Neighborhood Technology</title>
		<link>http://www.cnt.org/news/2009/02/27/support-the-green-infrastructure-for-clean-water-act/comment-page-1/#comment-35415</link>
		<dc:creator>April Bringing Cleaner Water to Illinois? : Center for Neighborhood Technology</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 21:22:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cnt.org/news/?p=886#comment-35415</guid>
		<description>[...] The Green Infrastructure for Clean Water Act (SB 1489), CNT’s effort to bring the benefits of natural systems for sustainable stormwater management into state plans, is headed for its first hearing in the Illinois House on Wednesday, April 29, having passed the Senate in March. That bill would instruct Illinois EPA to lead a study to establish state standards and goals for expanded, effective use of green infrastructure in urban areas statewide. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Green Infrastructure for Clean Water Act (SB 1489), CNT’s effort to bring the benefits of natural systems for sustainable stormwater management into state plans, is headed for its first hearing in the Illinois House on Wednesday, April 29, having passed the Senate in March. That bill would instruct Illinois EPA to lead a study to establish state standards and goals for expanded, effective use of green infrastructure in urban areas statewide. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katie Armstrong</title>
		<link>http://www.cnt.org/news/2009/02/27/support-the-green-infrastructure-for-clean-water-act/comment-page-1/#comment-34771</link>
		<dc:creator>Katie Armstrong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 21:40:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cnt.org/news/?p=886#comment-34771</guid>
		<description>I wonder if you include PROTECTION OF OUR AQUIFERS in

the support of the CLEAN WATER ACT . We in Park 

Forest have four wellheads within the proposed EJ&amp;E

Canadien National easement . The majority of the 

freight carried by CN is hazardous . The number of 

trains will increase by 400%. As you know State 

law bans all hazardous waste within a thousand 

foot radius of the wellhead , which exposes the 

aquifer to runoff down the well piping . As you 

know aquifers cannot be cleaned , they must be 

protected. Many of the municipalities along the 

arc have their clean water source similarily 

threatened . 

It seems to me that transport of hazardous 

waste ought to be banned in all urban 

areas. The Draft EIS of the CN proposal states 

that 300 jobs will be LOST by this 

project . Hardly worth the risk.

Now is the time to plan our rail system to 

benefit people. Passenger rail benefits 

us; freight trains are dangerous , noisy,  traffic 

stoppers . Being &quot;freight handler to the 

nation&quot; does nothing to improve the quality of life 

in Metropolitan Chicago. Plan to move 

freight from coast to coast through 

rural America , with no on- grade 

crossings , using easements along the 

more lightly used truck routes . Do 

it right. Decisions made now will be with us 

for centuries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if you include PROTECTION OF OUR AQUIFERS in</p>
<p>the support of the CLEAN WATER ACT . We in Park </p>
<p>Forest have four wellheads within the proposed EJ&amp;E</p>
<p>Canadien National easement . The majority of the </p>
<p>freight carried by CN is hazardous . The number of </p>
<p>trains will increase by 400%. As you know State </p>
<p>law bans all hazardous waste within a thousand </p>
<p>foot radius of the wellhead , which exposes the </p>
<p>aquifer to runoff down the well piping . As you </p>
<p>know aquifers cannot be cleaned , they must be </p>
<p>protected. Many of the municipalities along the </p>
<p>arc have their clean water source similarily </p>
<p>threatened . </p>
<p>It seems to me that transport of hazardous </p>
<p>waste ought to be banned in all urban </p>
<p>areas. The Draft EIS of the CN proposal states </p>
<p>that 300 jobs will be LOST by this </p>
<p>project . Hardly worth the risk.</p>
<p>Now is the time to plan our rail system to </p>
<p>benefit people. Passenger rail benefits </p>
<p>us; freight trains are dangerous , noisy,  traffic </p>
<p>stoppers . Being &#8220;freight handler to the </p>
<p>nation&#8221; does nothing to improve the quality of life </p>
<p>in Metropolitan Chicago. Plan to move </p>
<p>freight from coast to coast through </p>
<p>rural America , with no on- grade </p>
<p>crossings , using easements along the </p>
<p>more lightly used truck routes . Do </p>
<p>it right. Decisions made now will be with us </p>
<p>for centuries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk (enhanced)

Served from: www.cnt.org @ 2013-04-10 20:47:08 --